Thursday, March 22, 2012

Digital Stories Inside and Outside of the Classroom


As Diaz and Fields explained, a digital story is meant to make the audience question certain assumptions and seek a deeper understanding of something different. With that being said, there are ways to get certain results out of showing and viewing a digital story. Two examples are inside and outside of the classroom. In an academic setting, a major point of using digital stories is to teach students about what they are- much like we are doing. From there students create their own stories more for the purpose of the learning experience than to really get something out into the world. Instructors could also use these stories to prompt specific thoughts and feeling among students. For example, if a class is discussing issues in the Middle East and they viewed Wall of Hate, students would begin to consider the morality and purpose of the wall and question what should be done about it and how they feel in general. From there, discussion would more than likely occur. In academia, digital stories are manipulated so that they either can get students to do certain things or make them think in ways towards an assignment.

Outside of the classroom, I feel that there is more to get out of digital storytelling. This mainly has to do with what emotions and thoughts that are brought out in people and what this leads them to do. In class, after watching one of these stories, a student would either do their assignment or have their discussion and that is usually the end. Rarely would a student continue to ponder what they had seen. In any other situation, however, it is likely that action can be taken. Although this is a stretch, I think of the Kony 2012 video as an extended digital story. It has a “so what”, a provoking question, and delves into peoples’ lives that creates something very personal. After viewing that, millions of people have been called to take action and a countless amount of emotions can be said to have also been provoked.

It does not have to be as serious as that though. Let’s say that a person decides to create a story about how an accident left them unable to pursue their passion. An audience member would be prompted to think about the loss of something special and as a result, think more carefully about what they have and appreciate it. Of course it is possible that a story in a classroom setting could provoke students’ emotions, but the usage is altered so that certain emotions are hit and then certain actions are done. All in all, it is not a difference of what the stories contain and are made up of, but a difference in how they are approached and used.

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

The Challenges of Group Work (or the Lack Thereof)


            Usually when I hear the phrase “group work” I cringe, groan, and would much rather not have to deal with it. I have had my fair share of awful group experiences since coming to JMU- people that I do not get along with, slackers, not being able to meet, staying up late at the last minute to complete the assignment. I am surprised and pleased to say that this has not been the case in GWRTC this semester. I have honestly never had a group that could meet on time, meet briefly, and get the work done as swiftly as possible.

            With that being said, it is very hard to come up with any challenges I have had from this project. If anything, I would say that splitting up the work has been hard. I feel that all of my group members are willing to work hard and equally contribute, but with some sections being easier than others or some having to be more concise than others, it has been difficult to make sure everyone has done their part. Plus, we have an extra member so we have really had to struggle to make sure everyone has something to do.

            I would not like to know what it is like to do this type of assignment on my own. I know for sure that it would not be as good as if I had additional help from my group members. There is a lot that goes into this project- surveying, researching, and of course the writing. I am definitely better at research, so I feel that I would end up focusing on that and not have as much put into my surveys. In the end, I feel that my audience would be left knowing a lot about the background of my topic but not necessarily what I have done to test that idea.